flowmaster VS glasspack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
1989 fleetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 213
From: Jacksonville,FL
Default flowmaster VS glasspack

im deciding on wether or not to get an exhuast put on my 94 fleetwood. Has anyone had any experince with glass packs. The glass packs are going to be a lot cheaper and more in my prive range than the flowmasters. I had flows on my older caddy and it sounded good, but im not sure what glass packs sound like. When i hear the word glass packs i think of the sound it would make byjust taking off and exhuast and leaving it off. I dont know though so any inmput would be apprecitated becuase im getting it done in a couple of days.
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 03:22 PM
  #2  
rickyd's Avatar
Tech Certified Members
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,319
From: pennsylvania
Default

imo packs are louder.
rickyd
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 06:27 PM
  #3  
slowroll's Avatar
Tech Certified Members
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,160
From: in the mitten
Default

I would stay away from straight thru glass packs, It's a Cadillac not a "street car" Flowmasters or turbo mufflers will sound better. IMO
 
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 12:01 PM
  #4  
rcadblue4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 43
Default Go with Turbo style

Go with the turbo style mufflers Magnaflow, Flowmaster etc. I have them on my Deville and my big block 66 Charger. You get a nice mellow burble when you are just doing your daily commute. And they give a nice toned roar when you are pushing the go pedal. Most glass packs make your car sound like a threshing machine about to throw a rod. Plus glass packs will burn out rather quickly and you will have to replace them more.
Spend the money up front.
As was said before, its a Cadillac not a Camaro.
Cheers
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1989 fleetwood
Aftermarket Cadillac Modifications
0
Feb 24, 2008 07:55 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.