Cadillac Forums  
Cadillac Forum   Cadillac Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Member List   Calendars   Search   Contact CF   Sponsors
  Cadillac News   Forum FAQ   Cadillac Timeslips   Cadillac Recalls   TSBs   Register   Login  

glass packs, do or dont?

  Printable Version
Cadillac >> General Technical Section >> Aftermarket Cadillac Modifications >> glass packs, do or dont? Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
glass packs, do or dont? - 6/2/2008 3:44:58 PM   
1989 fleetwood

 

Posts: 149
Score: 0
Joined: 2/28/2007
Status: offline
Ive got a 94 fleetwood with a 5.7L I wanna put an exhuast on it like my older caddy. I just went with flowmasters on my other FWD fleetwood and it sounded good but this 94 is RWD so i wanna run new pipes all the way to the exhaust manifold. What are glass packs or glass backs exhaust? I heard that they cause a restriction resulting in less power but they sound really good. Maybe im thinking about cat backs? anyone know about different exhuast types?
Post #: 1
RE: glass packs, do or dont? - 6/19/2008 5:26:07 AM   
lowtrac

 

Posts: 3
Score: 0
Joined: 5/15/2008
Status: offline
I’m astounded that after 50 views you have no response.  Having come from the f-body world initially, then into the w-body Regal, I’ve been slowly moving into less technical forums.  It’s sad really, but I digress…

A Glasspack is a straight through cylinder style “muffler” that has a perforated tube surrounded with packed fiberglass as a sound deadener. Because it’s basically a tube, it’s loud and has very low back pressure.  As an aside, Glasspack is a trademark of the Cherry Bomb company.  Glasspack has however become a generic name for any tubular fiberglass packed muffler, i.e. the common usage of Kleenex and Q-Tips.  You also mention a cat-back exhaust.  Cat-back implies that the exhaust pipes are completely replaced from the catalytic converter(s) back.  I’m not familiar with the layout of the Fleetwood exhaust, so I’m not sure if it’s true duals, or a single into dual mufflers, or single into single with dual outlet muffler, etc…

I’ve always thought that a Glasspack was a bit much.  They’re cool on muscle cars, but for anything else, I’d stick with Flowmaster.  I seem to recall that the 95 Fleetwood had an LT1, but the 94 was the TBI 350 right?  I’m not sure what it sounds like, but IMO an LT1 with a Flowmaster sounds very nice, albeit loud if you go with a lower end model.  I had (I believe) a 50 series Flowmaster on my 1997 Z28 and could ride through the parking lot in 1st gear and set off car alarms.      

< Message edited by lowtrac -- 6/19/2008 5:37:15 AM >

(in reply to 1989 fleetwood)
Post #: 2
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Cadillac Forum >> General Technical Section >> Aftermarket Cadillac Modifications
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
stealth2860
g.a.r.y.1615
stomper1352
slowroll1254
katzmans cad1078
rickyd583
flcaddytech507
patrick398
brougham1369
hyperion364

New Vendors
Magnaflow
MagnaFlow Performance Exhaust
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Cadillac Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by General Motors Corporation.